Astrue

Miller v. Astrue

Bad Law
695 F. Supp. 2d 1042·2010 WL 334505·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7163
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2010CV 08-8226-RCCalifornia2,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Russell R. Miller filed a complaint on December 17, 2008, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying his application for disability benefits. On May 20, 2009, the Commissioner answered the complaint, and the parties filed a joint stipulation on June 19, 2009.

BACKGROUND

On October 31, 2005, plaintiff, who was then 52 years old, applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423 , claiming an inability to work since May 21, 2004, due to lead poisoning, dementia, and neuropsychological problems. Certified Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 94-98, 122. The plaintiffs application was initially denied on May 11, 2006, and was denied again on April 5, 2007, following reconsideration. A.R. 64-74. The plaintiff then requested an administrative hearing, which was held before Administrative Law Judge Lawrence D. Wheeler (“the ALJ”) on November 13, 2007. A.R. 26-48, 75. On January 29, 2008, the ALJ issued a decision finding plaintiff is not disabled. A.R. 7-21. The plaintiff appealed the decision to the Appeals Council, which denied review on October 10, 2008. A.R. 3-6.

DISCUSSION

I

The Court, pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.