Astrue

Lee v. Astrue

Good Law
695 F. Supp. 2d 1033·2010 WL 369125·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12888
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2010CV 08-7531 RCCalifornia3,846 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Louise Kam Har Lee filed a complaint on November 14, 2008, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for disability benefits. On April 24, 2009, the Commissioner answered the complaint, and the parties filed a joint stipulation on July 10, 2009.

BACKGROUND

I

On January 31, 2007, plaintiff applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423 , claiming an inability to work since December 2, 2006, due to Crohn’s disease. Certified Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 71-78, 85. The plaintiffs application was initially denied on April 12, 2007. A.R. 50-54. The plaintiff then requested an administrative hearing, which was held before Administrative Law Judge Jeffrey A. Hatfield (“the ALJ”) on February 27, 2008. A.R. 17-48, 58. On May 20, 2008, the ALJ issued a decision finding plaintiff is not disabled. A.R. 7-16. The plaintiff appealed this decision to the Appeals Council, which denied review on September 16, 2008. A.R. 1-6.

II

The plaintiff, who was born on November 2, 1950, is currently 59 years old. A.R. 21, 71. She has an associate certificate from Hong Kong, and previously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.