Bank of America, NA v. City of Daly City, Cal.

Good Law
279 F. Supp. 2d 1118·2003 WL 22048515·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14272
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2003C 02-4343 CW, C 02-4943 CWCalifornia4,843 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A. (USA); Bank of America Investment Services, Inc.; Banc of America Insurance Services, Inc.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank Nevada, N.A.; Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc.; and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Co., Inc. have sued challenging local consumer privacy ordinances as preempted under federal law. Defendants are the City of Daly City, California; County of San Mateo, California; County of Contra Costa, California; and various county and municipal officers. Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants oppose Plaintiffs’ motion and have filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, which Plaintiffs oppose. The matter was heard on May 30, 2003. After consideration of all the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion in part and DENIES it in part and GRANTS Defendants’ motion in part and DENIES it in part. The Court declares that the ordinances at issue are preempted under federal law to the extent that the ordinances restrict the sharing of confidential consumer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.