Tokuda

Iconix, Inc. v. Tokuda

Good Law

457 F. Supp. 2d 969·2006 WL 2785141·66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 422·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73380

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2006C 06-2201 SBA. [Docket Nos. 21, 82, 116, 130]California15,754 words

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 21], Defendants’ Eviden-tiary Objections to the Declaration of Ronald Alepín and Jeff Wilbur [Docket No. 82], Plaintiffs Objections to Certain Evidence filed in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Strike [Docket No. 116], and Defendants’ Objections to New Evidence and Argument in Iconix’s Reply Memorandum [Docket No. 130],

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Iconix, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Ico-nix”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business in Mountain View, California.

Defendants in this matter are Lance Tokuda, Jia Shen, and netPickle, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”).

Defendant Lance Tokuda (“Tokuda”) is a former employee and officer of Iconix; Tokuda resides in Foster City, California.

Defendant Jia Shen (“Shen”) is a former employee of Iconix; Shen resides in East Palo Alto, California.

Defendant netPickle, Inc. (“Netpickle”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has its principal place of business in Foster City, California.

Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.