Evans

Earth Island Institute v. Evans

Good Law
256 F. Supp. 2d 1064·2003 WL 1870323·25 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2172·56 ERC (BNA) 2013·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6057
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 2003C 03-0007 THECalifornia8,835 words

Opinion

Opinion

Henderson, J.

ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

This matter came before the Court on Monday, April 7, 2003, on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. Having carefully considered the written and oral arguments presented, the record herein, and the governing law, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion for the reasons set forth below.

I. BACKGROUND

Much of the background to this action is set forth in great detail in the prior opinions of this Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and will not be repeated here. See Brower v. Daley, 93 F.Supp.2d 1071 (N.D.Cal.2000) (“Brower I”); aff'd Brower v. Evans, 257 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir.2001). At issue, once again, is a finding by the Secretary of Commerce (“Secretary”) under the International Dolphin Conservation Program Act (“IDCPA”) regarding the impact of purse seine fishing operations on dolphins who inhabit the Eastern Tropical Pacific ocean (“ETP”).

Over the last thirty years, Congress has enacted various legislation in response to public outcry over millions of dolphins deaths caused by tuna fishermen using purse seine nets in the ETP. Brower, 257 F.3d at 1060 . In 1990, Congress enacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.