Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a Corporation

Good Law
232 F.2d 897
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 195614299California4,187 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The decision on the merits of the der claratory relief injunction case. in. suit as to infringement of patents was formalized in the district court’s judgment which followed our mandate in accordance with our opinion and decision. Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Lab., Inc., 9 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 624 . These two appeals are from the district court’s- judgment referred to and concern the proper assessment of costs, att torney fees claimed allowable to the plaintiff, and an issue of damages claimed by the plaintiff for libel or slander as to plaintiff’s patents. In the opinion and the judgment which has become final, costs were allowed but notwithstanding attorney fees and damages were claimed by plaintiff, we made no mention of either in our opinion, decision, or mandate.

In the trial of the case, it was held by the district court that Kemart Corporation, the plaintiff, had infringed some of Printing Arts patents. Upon that conclusion it followed logically that neither costs, attorney fees nor damages could properly be allowed Kemart, the losing party, and of course were not allowed. The situation was changed radically when we reversed on the infringing issue, .leaving the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.