Rodriguez

United States v. Rodriguez

Good Law
423 F. Supp. 110·1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12035
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1976CR 76-636-AAHCalifornia486 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hauk, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The motion of defendant Ramon Rodriguez for granting of bail pending sentence in the above-entitled action having come on for hearing before the Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, United States District Judge, on November 22, 1976, defendant having appeared with his counsel, Simon Kornbrodt, and plaintiff having appeared through their attorneys, William D. Keller, United States Attorney, Eric A. Nobles, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Criminal Division, by Robert Ramsey, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, and the Court having considered the files and records of the case, and the pleadings herein, including the facts of the case and the defendant’s motion for bail pending sentence, together with defendant’s attorney’s declaration, and oral argument at the time of the hearing, and being fully advised, and the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I

On October 28, 1976, the defendant was convicted by a jury of violating Title 21, United States Code, §§ 963 , 952, 846, and 841(a)(1), (Conspiracy to Import and Conspiracy to Possess with the Intent to Distribute a Narcotic Controlled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.