Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp.

Good Law
374 F. Supp. 2d 825·2005 WL 1530098·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16741
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 2005C 03-5665 MHPCalifornia11,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of Validity and Invalidity

Plaintiff Network Appliance filed this action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of three patents that relate to network file server architecture and operating system software. On defendant’s motion, the District of Delaware ordered the action transferred to this court on December 16, 2003. Now before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment of validity and invalidity of United States Patent Nos. 5,802,366 (“ ’366 Patent”), 5,931,918 (“’918 Patent”), and 6,065,037 (“’037 Patent”). Having fully considered the parties’ arguments and submissions and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.

BACKGROUND

I. The Patents in Suit and the Prior Art

The patents that are the subject of this infringement action relate to computer architectures and storage systems that were developed by Auspex Systems, Inc. in the late 1980s. The ’366 Patent, issued on September 1, 1998, and the ’918 Patent, issued on August 3, 1999, disclose substantially identical multiprocessor file server designs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.