Fortaleza

Fortaleza v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Good Law
642 F. Supp. 2d 1012·2009 WL 2246212·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64624
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 2009C 09-2004 PJHCalifornia7,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamilton, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING DATE

Before the court is a motion to dismiss and a motion to strike filed by defendants PNC Financial Services Group., Inc. (“PNC”) and National City Bank (“National City”). Plaintiff Alicia Fortaleza did not oppose the motion. Nor did plaintiff file a statement of non-opposition pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3. Because the court finds that oral argument is unnecessary and would not be helpful, the hearing date of July 29, 2009 is VACATED pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1 (b). For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

This action arises out of the initiation of non-judicial foreclosure proceedings on real property purchased by plaintiff. Plaintiff is a resident of San Mateo County and the owner of real property located at 2460 Ardee Lane, South San Francisco, CA 94080 (the “property”). First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶ 2. Plaintiff purchased her home in 2005. Plaintiff financed the acquisition of the property with two loans issued by National City, the first for $792,000 and the second for $147,000. Id. ¶ 50.

After plaintiff fell in arrears on loan payments, a non-judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.