Lauter

Lauter v. Anoufrieva

Good Law
642 F. Supp. 2d 1060·2009 WL 2192362·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61186
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 2009Case CV 07-6811 JVS(JC)California26,142 words

Opinion

Opinion

Selna, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[RE DKT. NOS. 75, 77, 78, 84, 109]

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all documents filed in connection with the pending motions to dismiss, motion to strike, and motions for summary judgment, and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), the parties’ objections thereto, and the parties’ responses to the objections. The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and adopts the Report and Recommendation with the following modifications: (1) Claim Ten is dismissed with leave to amend; and (2) Footnote 30, at page 23 is deleted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) the Motion to Dismiss is in part and denied in part; (2) the Anoufrieva Motion is denied; (8) the Anti-SLAPP Motion is denied without prejudice; (4) Plaintiffs Summary Judgment Motions are denied; (5) to the extent plaintiff elects to amend those portions of the First Amended Complaint as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.