Miller v. Wahyou

Good Law
235 F.2d 612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 195614902_1California2,776 words

Opinion

Opinion

235 F.2d 612 G. A. MILLER, W. W. Lord, Ralph Smeed, L. H. Staus and Jack Smeed, Trustees of John W. Smeed Estate, Appellants, v. Sam WAHYOU, Diamond-S Ranch Co., Sam Wahyou, K. R. Nutting and Thomas G. Lee, as Trustees for the assets of Diamond-S Ranch Co., Thomas G. Lee, Toy Quong, Joe Sin, K. R. Nutting, Yip K. Toon and Herbert Jang, Appellees. No. 14902. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 8, 1956. Rehearing Denied July 16, 1956. Pike & McLaughlin, Reno, Nev., Carver, McClenahan & Greenfield, Boise, Idaho, Smith & Ewing, Caldwell, Idaho, for appellants. John S. Halley, Reno, Nev., for A. E. Corbari and Marie Corbari. John Davidson, Reno, Nev., Forrest E. Macomber, Stockton, Cal., for Diamond-S Ranch Co. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. 1 This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, denying appellants, who allegedly own an undivided interest in the assets of the Diamond-S Ranch Co. corporation, equitable relief against that corporation and its directors. 1 Appellants urge that the District Court erred in not finding that they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.