Lester v. Parker
Opinion
Opinion
235 F.2d 787 J. A. LESTER, Jack Eaton, John A. Rylander, Joseph E. Stika, J. E. Hennewyk, L. E. Carlson, Appellants, v. Lawrence E. PARKER, Peter Mendelsohn, Fred H. Kulper, Claude Paney, Theodore W. Rolfs, Harold Fontaine, Appellees. No. 14081. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 27, 1956. Rehearing Denied Oct. 1, 1956. Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Donald B. MacGuineas, Paul A. Sweeney, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Lloyd H. Burke, U.S. Atty., Cal., Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, for appellants. Gladstein, Andersen, Leonard & Sibbett, Richard Gladstein, Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before HEALY, McALLISTER and POPE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Following the issuance of our mandate in Parker v. Lester, 9 Cir., 227 F.2d 708, 717 , the district court, on motion of the plaintiffs, entered its decree for the purpose of carrying out our judgment as directed. Claiming that the decree thus entered is not in accordance with the opinion and mandate of this court, and also that it is beyond the trial court's jurisdiction, the defendants have brought this appeal. 2 We are of the opinion that the decree is in…