Hardy

Hardy v. 3 UNKNOWN AGENTS

Good Law
690 F. Supp. 2d 1074·2010 WL 538666·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12100
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2010CV 05-4520-MMM (MAN)California13,715 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrow, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all of the files and records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections filed by defendants. The time for filing Objections had passed and no Objections have been filed by plaintiff. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendations therein.

IT IS ORDERED that:

The motion for summary judgment brought by the remaining defendants, Dr. Echendu and Dr. Fortaleza, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Motion”), is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as follows:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of the Order on plaintiff and on counsel for defendants.

CHESTER LEON HARDY, Plaintiff, v. DR. NERIZZA ANDRADA, et al., Defendants.

AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Amended Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Margaret M. Morrow, United States Disti'iet Judge, pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.