Getz

Getz v. Boeing Co.

Good Law
690 F. Supp. 2d 982·2010 WL 334899·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5127
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2010C 07-06396 CWCalifornia7,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell), The Boeing Company (Boeing) and Goodrich Pump & Engine Control Systems, Inc. (Goodrich) have filed separate motions for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the government contractor defense. Plaintiffs oppose the motions. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on December 10, 2009, the Court grants Defendants’ summary judgment motions.

BACKGROUND

On February 17, 2007, a United States Army Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) MH-47E Chinook helicopter bearing Tail # 94-00472 crashed in the Zabul Province of Afghanistan. All twenty-two individuals on board the helicopter were military personnel. Plaintiffs are the survivors of the crash and the heirs of the individuals who were killed in the crash. Defendants are companies that designed, assembled, manufactured, inspected, tested, marketed and sold the helicopter, its component parts and related software and hardware.

The following facts regarding the details of the crash are taken from the Army Regulation 15-6 Report of Proceedings by Investigating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.