Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W. J. Whiteaker v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation
236 F.2d 224
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 195614734_1California80 words
Opinion
The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the district court were correctly drawn,
The judgment is affirmed, upon the opinion of the district court in W.D. Wash.1954, 125 F.Supp. 481 ;