Studebaker

Studebaker v. Uribe

Good Law
658 F. Supp. 2d 1102·2009 WL 2601241·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74396
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2009CV 08-2805 ODW (FMO)California13,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright II, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Petition, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on the parties.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Otis D. Wright II, United States District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

INTRODUCTION

On June 3, 2008, petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . On September 26, 2008, respondent filed an Answer to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.