Pioche Mines Consoldated v. Foley

Good Law
237 F.2d 164·1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2866
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 195615198California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

237 F.2d 164 PIOCHE MINES CONSOLDATED, Inc., Pioche Mines Company and John January, Petitioners, v. Hon. Roger T. FOLEY, as Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Respondents. No. 15198. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Oct. 5, 1956. Bradford Bosley, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. William J. Forman, Reno, Nev., Thomas B. K. Ringe, J. Tyson Stokes, Philadelphia, Pa., Woodburn, Forman, Wedge, Blakey & Thompson, Reno, Nev., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., for intervenors Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. Before STEPHENS, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioners, hereafter generally referred to as Pioche, seek mandate to compel the respondent court and judge to dismiss an 'amended supplemental complaint,' which was filed by Fidelity (plaintiff below and intervener here) subsequent to our decisions and mandates on prior appeals in this case. The district judge refused to rule on Pioche's motion to dismiss the aforesaid amended supplemental complaint. Instead, he postponed action thereon until the time of trial. 2 Our opinions and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.