Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell

Good Law
237 F.2d 229
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 2, 195615240_1California101 words

Opinion

237 F.2d 229 Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant, v. Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee. Nos. 15239, 15240. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Oct. 2, 1956. Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant. Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759 ; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679 .