Hermann v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Opinion
Opinion
237 F.2d 359 16 P.U.R.3d 191 Ida Mae HERMANN, Irving E. Hermann, Robert M. Smith, M. B. Scott, Harold Shein, H. C. Richards, George Patterson, Leonard Rosen, Orville Kelman and Captain G. D. Thompson, Appellants, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Appellee. No. 14778. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 2, 1956. Keatinge, Arnold & Older, Roland E. Ginsburg, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Max F. Deutz, Andrew J. Weisz, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., Stanley N. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Earl E. Pollock, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Robert L. Griffith and Robert Burstein, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge. 1 This case is related to the enforcement of ten administrative subpoenas duces tecum served upon appellants in the course of a proceeding pending before a hearing examiner of the Civil Aeronautics Board. 1 The period covered by the documents required under most of the subpoenas is thirty-eight months. The individual subpoenas are comprehensive of practically all records, books and documents of or concerning…