Hermann v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Good Law
237 F.2d 359·1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4917
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 195614778California2,240 words

Opinion

Opinion

237 F.2d 359 16 P.U.R.3d 191 Ida Mae HERMANN, Irving E. Hermann, Robert M. Smith, M. B. Scott, Harold Shein, H. C. Richards, George Patterson, Leonard Rosen, Orville Kelman and Captain G. D. Thompson, Appellants, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Appellee. No. 14778. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 2, 1956. Keatinge, Arnold & Older, Roland E. Ginsburg, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Max F. Deutz, Andrew J. Weisz, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., Stanley N. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Earl E. Pollock, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Robert L. Griffith and Robert Burstein, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge. 1 This case is related to the enforcement of ten administrative subpoenas duces tecum served upon appellants in the course of a proceeding pending before a hearing examiner of the Civil Aeronautics Board. 1 The period covered by the documents required under most of the subpoenas is thirty-eight months. The individual subpoenas are comprehensive of practically all records, books and documents of or concerning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.