Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corporation Of America

Good Law
237 F.2d 386
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 195614968California730 words

Opinion

Opinion

237 F.2d 386 Harry X. BERGMAN, Perma-Lox Aluminum Shingle Corporation and Victor H. Langville, doing business under the assumed name of Langville Manufacturing Company, Appellants, v. ALUMINUM LOCK SHINGLE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellee. No. 14968. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 12, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 20, 1956. Elmer A. Buckhorn, Buckhorn & Cheatham, Robert F. Maguire, Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, J. Pierre Kolisch, Ramsey & Kolisch, Portland, Or., for appellant. S. J. Bischoff, Portland, Or., H. H. Brown, H. A. Toulmin, Jr., Toulmin & Toulmin, Dayton, Ohio, for appellee. Before HEALY, POPE and LEMMON, Circuit Judges. LEMMON, Circuit Judge. 1 A suit for infringement was brought below by the appellee as the assignee of Korter patent No. 2,631,552, for "Aluminum Shingle", issued March 17, 1953. The complaint also charged unfair competition and prayed for a permanent injunction against manufacture, sale, use and infringement by the appellants, and a decree enjoining them from competing unfairly with the appellee, for recovery of general and special damages, etc. 2 The appellants denied the charges, contending that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.