Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No. 183 v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
238 F.2d 195·38 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2305·1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4548
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 195614779California1,520 words

Opinion

Opinion

238 F.2d 195 TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 183, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 14779. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 14, 1956. Bassett, Geisness & Vance, Samuel B. Bassett, George H. Davis, Seattle, Wash., for appellant. Theophil C. Kamholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, John Jay, Owsley Vose, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HEALY, LEMMON and FEE, Circuit Judges. LEMMON, Circuit Judge. 1 The Respondent's Trial Examiner issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that it would not effectuate the policies of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. 151 et seq., for the Respondent to accept jurisdiction in this case, and recommending that the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. The Respondent adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner, in a modified form. 2 The Respondent stated that the employer, Homer W. Robinson, dba…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.