Jesse Flores and Carmen Flores v. United States

Good Law
238 F.2d 758·1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4091
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 195615171_1California564 words

Opinion

Opinion

On January 24, 1956, Jesse Flores was tried and convicted, on six counts, of violating various provisions of the narcotics and conspiracy laws of the United States. His wife, Carmen, was at the same time convicted on four such counts. Jesse was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and one dollar fine on each count. His terms of imprisonment were so arranged, as to concurrent and consecutive serving, that he received a total prison sentence of thirty years. Carmen received like sentences, on the four counts of which she was convicted. In her case, the terms of imprisonment were so arranged, as to concurrent and consecutive serving, that she received a total prison sentence of twenty years. Neither defendant appealed.

On March 19,1956, counsel for defendants filed in the district court a motion to modify the judgments. This motion was made on the ground that “the ends of justice would be served” by reducing in whole or in part the terms of imprisonment imposed by the court. In a supporting’ affidavit, various mitigating circumstances were set out, in an effort to persuade the trial court that the sentences should be reduced. A letter dated March 20, 1956, from Jesse Flores to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.