Delino

Delino v. Platinum Community Bank

Good Law
628 F. Supp. 2d 1226·2009 WL 1726103·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57721
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20093:09-mj-00288California4,843 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huff, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PLATINUM & TB & W’S MOTION TO DISMISS

On February 17, 2009, Defendant Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (“TB & W”) removed this case from the Superior Court of California in and for the County of San Diego. (Doc. No. 1.) On April 23, 2009, Defendants TB & W and Platinum Community Bank (“Platinum”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Liwayway Delino’s complaint. (Doc. No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a response in opposition and request for judicial notice on May 11, 2009. (Doc. No. 9.) Defendants filed a reply on May 19, 2009. (Doc. No. 12.)

The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), determines this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and submits it on the parties’ papers. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Background

Plaintiffs complaint arises from foreclosure proceedings on her home. Plaintiff alleges causes of action for (1) violation of RESPA, 12 U.S.C. § 2605 et seq.; (2) violation of Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.; (3) violation of California Civil Code § 1632 et seq.; (4) negligent misrepresentation; (5) fraud; (6) rescission; (7) unjust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.