United States Satellite Broadcasting Co. v. Lynch

Good Law
41 F. Supp. 2d 1113·1999 WL 138519·27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1586·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2929
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1999Civ. S-98-1838 WBS/DADCalifornia4,789 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shubb, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenges “the Boxing Act,” a California law that imposes a five percent gross receipts tax on all pay-per-view telecasts of boxing, wrestling, kickboxing, and similar contests. See Cal.B. & P.Code § 18600. Plaintiff refused to pay the tax following its telecast of the Holyfield versus Tyson boxing match of June, 28, 1997, and brought this action to declare the tax unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and to enjoin its enforcement. Defendants, members of the State Athletic Commission (“the Commission”) responsible for collecting and enforcing the tax, move for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim, and also move for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6); 56. Plaintiff also moves for summary judgment.

The material facts are straightforward and undisputed. Plaintiff broadcasts programming to its subscribers by satellite. This programming includes pay-per-view telecasts of boxing, martial arts, and wrestling events. The Boxing Act requires broadcasters of such telecasts viewed in California to pay to the Commission a five…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.