Fonseca

Fonseca v. Hall

Good Law
568 F. Supp. 2d 1110·2008 WL 2949429·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71042
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2008CV 04-5836-CJC (RC)California11,100 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carney, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition and other papers along with the attached Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner’s objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Final Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Final Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the First Amended Petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order of the Court adopting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the First Amended Petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice.

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.