Frost

Frost v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Good Law
470 F. Supp. 2d 1101·2007 WL 135625·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6312
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2007CV 05-2486-JFW (SSX)California3,604 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walter, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This action came on for court trial on December 20, 2006. Glenn R. Kantor and Alan E. Kassan of Kantor & Kantor, LLP appeared for Plaintiff Sandra Frost (“Plaintiff’). Julie I. LaRoe of Seyfarth Shaw LLP appeared for Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and The Wells Fargo & Company Long Term Disability Plan (collectively “Defendants”).

After considering the evidence, briefs and argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings Of Fact

I. Introduction

This is an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 , et seq. (“ERISA”) for recovery of long term disability benefits under a group long term disability plan issued by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) for the benefit of employees of Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”). On April 1, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Complaint with this Court seeking review of MetLife’s cancellation of Plaintiffs long term disability (“LTD”) benefits under The Wells Fargo & Company Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”).

II. Facts

Plaintiff commenced her employment with Wells Fargo in 1991. In 2002,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.