Mateo v. Auto Rental Company

Good Law
240 F.2d 831·1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 195715227_1California2,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

240 F.2d 831 Ernest MATEO, Joseph Oku, Joseph K. Nakila, Joseph Acello, Wade H. Redmon, Harry L. Perry, Herman K. Kapule, Kenton Aichele, William T. Ahia, and James B. Jay, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of other employees of the defendants similarly situated, Appellants, v. AUTO RENTAL COMPANY, Ltd., and Thacker Transportation Co., Ltd., Appellees. No. 15227. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. January 23, 1957. Gill, Kokubun, Doi & Shim, Thomas P. Gill, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant. Ernest C. Moore, Jr., Honolulu, Hawaii (Moore, Torkildson & Rice, Honolulu, Hawaii, of counsel), for appellee. Stuart Rothman, Sol., Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol., Sylvia S. Ellison, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Kenneth C. Robertson, Reg. Atty., U. S. Dept. of Labor, San Francisco, Cal., for James P. Mitchell, as amicus curiae. Before ORR, CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. 1 This appeal raises primarily a question relating to the scope of coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The District Court held that appellants were not employees "engaged in commerce" within the meaning of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.