United States v. Parkinson

Good Law
240 F.2d 918·1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 195615032_1California2,492 words

Opinion

Opinion

240 F.2d 918 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Wayne A. PARKINSON, an Individual Trading and Doing Business as Glandular Products and Dybutol Company, and Allen H. Parkinson, and Individual Trading and Doing Business as Tide Mailing Service, and Margaret M. Willis, Appellees. No. 15032. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 21, 1956. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Max F. Deutz, Asst. U.S. Atty., Arthur A. Dickerman, Attorney, Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Daniels, Elson & Mathews, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before FEE, BARNES and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge. 1 This cause was brought at the instance of Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, in the name of the United States of America against the individuals named as defendants, praying that these latter be restrained from introducing into interstate commerce certain misbranded drugs and requiring defendants to make restitution to purchasers thereof, present and past. The claimed misbranding related to relief from male sexual weakness and impotence and to rapid sexual rejuvenation. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.