Molski

Molski v. Rapazzini Winery

Good Law
400 F. Supp. 2d 1208·2005 WL 3233086·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39236
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 2005C-04-1881 PVTCalifornia1,994 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trumbull, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECLARE JAREK MOLKSI A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Jarek Molski (“Molski”), an individual, and Disability Rights Enforcement, Education Services: Helping You Help Others (“DREES”), a California public benefit corporation, brought suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) 42 U.S.C. § 12101 and various California State Statutes. Plaintiffs allege that: Molski is a person with a disability; the Rapazzini Winery is a place of public accommodation, subject to the requirements of Title III of the ADA and the requirements of California Civil Code § 54; on or about May 20, 2003, Molski was a guest of the Rapazzini Winery for purposes of wine tasting; the winery contained no handicapped van accessible parking, the tasting counter height exceeded the Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (“ADAAG”); the restroom was not accessible; and Molski injured himself during attempted transfers to and from the toilet. Under the ADA, Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief compelling Defendants to make the winery accessible…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.