National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1976

241 F.2d 147 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 1976, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL, and Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters and Nathan Fleisher, Respondents. No. 15026. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Feb. 12, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Arthur Garrett and James M. Nicoson, Los Angeles, Cal., for Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, etc., et al. Before HEALY, LEMMON, and FEE, Circuit Judges. LEMMON, Circuit Judge. 1 While the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act, has been termed in 'its inception a novel experiment', which 'has remained a controversial piece of legislation', 1 its provisions dealing with secondary boycotts-- at least insofar as they are applicable to the instant case-- seem to us to be tolerably clear and eminently fair. 1. Statement of the Case 2 The Sand Door and Plywood Company, of Los Angeles, California hereinafter Sand, on August 25, 1954, filed a…