Foster

Foster v. City of Oakland

Good Law
621 F. Supp. 2d 779·2008 WL 823338·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24610
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2008C 05-3110 MHP, C 04-4843 MHP, C 05-3204 MHP, C 06-2426 MHP, C 07-1773 MHPCalifornia7,588 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

Plaintiffs Darnell Foster, Rafael Duarte and Yancie Young have brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against the City of Oakland (“Oakland”); Richard Word, individually and in his capacity as the Oakland Chief of Police; Oakland police officers J. Festag and William Bergeron, individually and in their official capacities as police officers; and Does 1-25, alleging that defendants violated plaintiffs’ constitutional rights through a policy and practice of performing strip searches and body-cavity searches in public. Plaintiffs seek both injunctive relief and damages. Foster v. City of Oakland, Case No. C 05-3110 MHP, has been related to four similar cases pending in the Northern District of California, and this order applies to each of them. Now before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. After considering the parties’ arguments and submissions and for the reasons set forth below, the court rules as follows.

BACKGROUND

1. The Parties

The following order pertains to all of the parties in Foster and the related cases. A description of the claims brought by the three plaintiffs in Foster is included below and is representative of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.