Edwards

Edwards v. Ollison

Good Law
621 F. Supp. 2d 863·2008 WL 5158727·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99220
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 2008CV 06-5084-SJO (PLA)California8,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

Otero, J.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge’s final report and recommendation filed herein and petitioner’s objections and supplemental objections. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court submits this Final Report and Recommendation to the Honorable S. James Otero, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons set forth below, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice.

I.

SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS

Following a bench trial in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court, petitioner was convicted of possession of methamphetamine ( Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11377 (a)). The trial court also found that petitioner suffered four prior “strike” convictions for robbery, and that he had served five prior prison terms. (Lodgment No. 3 at 1, 3).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.