Kucharczyk

Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of California

Good Law
48 F. Supp. 2d 964·1999 WL 300659·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6905
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 1999C 94-3886 CRB, C 96-2247 CRBCalifornia7,581 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiffs John Kucharczyk and Michael Moseley have filed suit against UC Regents and the Nycomed defendants (Ny-comed Salutar and Nycomed Imaging A.S., collectively “Nycomed”), alleging that they acted to improperly deprive plaintiffs of their rightful share of the financial rewards of a patented medical technique they developed. A number of summary judgment motions are presently before the Court.

BACKGROUND

A. The Patent

The dispute arises out of the invention of a particular kind of magnetic resonance imaging technique (“MRI”). MRI is a process whereby physicians obtain an image of an internal part of the body in a way that allows them to discover a contrast between healthy and diseased tissues. This contrast is enhanced through the use of “contrast agents” that are injected into the patients undergoing MRI.

One particular type of magnetic resonance imaging is “perfusion MRI,” which is a technique for detecting and determining the extent of blood flow in body tissues, and thereby detecting the presence of any blood flow abnormalities. Plaintiffs invented a particular method for conducting perfusion MRI, which was ultimately patented as U.S. Patent No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.