Cardiner

Cardiner v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

Good Law
158 F. Supp. 2d 1088·2001 WL 931106·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18088
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2001CV00-2021DTAIJXCalifornia8,126 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tevrizian, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY’S REQUEST. FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. Background

A. Factual Summary

This action is brought by Plaintiff Barry M. Cardiner (“Plaintiff’) against Defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Provident”) for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing.

The following facts are undisputed

Provident issued individual disability Policy No. 6-835-8080449 (“Policy”) to Plaintiff effective September 24, 1987. In September 1990, Plaintiff submitted a claim to Provident contending that on or after September 21, 1990, he was totally disabled from his occupation from dys-thymic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”). His disability claim was supported by his attending psychiatrist, Dr. Davidson, who stated Plaintiff was “[u]nable to concentrate, relax, or work properly.”

On an occupational questionnaire, Plaintiff described his job duties as a stockbroker as including “cold calls” to prospects, speaking to clients trying to sell them stocks and bonds, managing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.