Fitzgerald

Fitzgerald v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
485 F. Supp. 2d 1137·2007 WL 1241945·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30915
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 20, 2007CV 03-01876 DDP RZXCalifornia6,973 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND INJUNCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to extend an injunction entered into between Plaintiffs and the City of Los Angeles pursuant to a settlement agreement. After reviewing the papers submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court grants the motion in the manner outlined below.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Settlement History

Plaintiffs are residents of Los Angeles who live in downtown Los Angeles in the area of the Central City known as Skid Row. On March 18, 2003, Plaintiffs Donald Fitzgerald, Delbert Eugene Hudson, Dil-worth Menefele and Mario Youngblood filed a complaint on behalf of themselves and similarly situated individuals challenging the conduct of the Los Angeles Police Department. (Declaration of Anne Richardson (“Richardson Decl.”), Ex. 1.) Plaintiffs alleged that they were subjected to an unlawful policy, practice and custom of harassment on the pretext that the police were seeking probation and/or parole violators or absconders. Plaintiffs further alleged that the policy was intended to, and did, create a climate of fear and intimidation among the poorest residents of Los Angeles in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.