Schreiber

Simmonds and Narita LLP v. Schreiber

Good Law
566 F. Supp. 2d 1015·2008 WL 2842938·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78763
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2008C 08-2209 SICalifornia1,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE

Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue or in the alternative to transfer. The motion is scheduled for hearing on July 25, 2008. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule T — 1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and hereby VACATES the hearing. Having considered the papers submitted, the Court hereby DENIES defendants’ motion to dismiss for improper venue.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff is a California law firm and limited liability partnership. Defendant Jeffrey Schreiber is a resident of the State of Indiana. Defendant Suzanne E. Schreiber is a resident of the State of Massachusetts. Defendants were served with a civil lawsuit (“underlying lawsuit”) in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, on or about August 25, 2004, Robert M. Siemons v. First USA Bank et al., Case No. VG04172153. The plaintiff in the underlying lawsuit alleged that the Schriebers and business entities associated with the Schriebers provided credit reports to credit bureaus which falsely stated that the plaintiff owed certain debts. Pi’s Request for Judicial Notice, Ex. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.