Keel

Keel v. Dovey

Good Law
459 F. Supp. 2d 946·2006 WL 3208501·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83476
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2006CV 03-2907-RGK(OP)California5,738 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klausner, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing this action with prejudice.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

PROCEEDINGS

On April 25, 2003, Plaintiff, Connie Keel (“Plaintiff’), an inmate at California Institution for Women at Chino (“CIW”) filed the current pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The Complaint names five defendants (“Defendants”): Warden J. Dovey (“Dovey”); Associate Warden John Lee (“Lee”); Correctional Lieutenant S. Randolph (“Randolph”);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.