Hansen

Hansen v. Schubert

Good Law
459 F. Supp. 2d 973·2006 WL 2792819
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2006CIV. S-02-0850 FCD GGHCalifornia12,372 words

Opinion

Opinion

Damrell, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendants’ Arthur Schubert, Greg A. Ziegler, Vincent Zambrana, Stephanie McCall, and Craig Burson’s (“defendants”) motion for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, summary adjudication pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of a search of plaintiffs’ residence and business pursuant to a search warrant pertaining to allegations of tax evasion against plaintiffs. Plaintiffs assert various violations of their constitutional rights based upon the issuance and execution of the search warrant.

Defendant Schubert was a criminal investigator with the California Department of Employment Development (“EDD”). (SDF a 2, ¶ 1). On August 9, 2000, Schubert received a call from a confidential informant (“Cl”), reporting what he believed to be an illegal tax evasion payroll scheme involving Shasta General Engineering, Inc. (“SGE”). (SDF at 2, ¶4). According to the informant, SGE was issuing two checks to each employee, one for wages and one for purported equipment rental. (SDF at 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.