Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Morizo Nakashima

Good Law
243 F.2d 787
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 195715197_1California2,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover property vested under the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1 et seq. Plaintiff Akira Morimoto died after the appeal was filed, and his executor, Morizo Nakashima, now appears as woellee.

Appellant contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction because the action was not brought within the period of limitation specified in § 33 of the act.

The real estate which is the subject matter of the suit vested in appellant on December 17, 1947, when the vesting order was filed with the Federal Register. A notice of claim to the property was filed with the Office of Alien Property, Department of Justice, on October 17, 1950. The original complaint herein was filed October 23, 1950.

The suit was commenced pursuant to § 9(a) of the act. This statute confers jurisdiction upon district courts to entertain a suit in equity to establish the claimant’s right to, and obtain the return of, property seized under the act. Section 33 of the act specifies the time within which notices of claim made pursuant to § 9 or § 32, and suits authorized by § 9, must be filed. Section 33, as it read when the instant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.