In Re Citric Acid Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
145 F. Supp. 2d 1152·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7619
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2001C-95-2963-CALCalifornia1,569 words

Opinion

Opinion

Legge, J.

ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS TO CLASS MEMBERS

Plaintiffs’ class counsel brings this motion for approval of a proposed plan for the distribution of the proceeds of the class settlement. Certain class members object to the plan, because the proposed method of distribution would pay settlement proceeds calculated on purchases some of the class members made from a non-settling defendant which was found not to be liable. The motion has been briefed, argued and submitted for decision. The court has reviewed the record of the case, the moving and opposing papers on this motion, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable authorities.

I.

This antitrust action arises from an alleged conspiracy by certain manufacturers, sellers and distributors to fix the prices of citric acid. Numerous class actions were filed and were later transferred to this court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

The class complaints name five defendants. Four defendants settled in 1996 for approximately $86 million, leaving Cargill Inc. as the sole remaining defendant. Class counsel did not seek approval to distribute the settlement proceeds at that time.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.