In Re Homestore. Com, Inc. Securities Litigation

Good Law
347 F. Supp. 2d 814·2004 WL 2792456·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25232
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2004CV 01-11115-RSWLCalifornia2,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lew, J.

ORDER

Defendant Stuart Wolffs (“Wolff’) Motion for (1) continuance of trial date and all scheduled pre-trial dates, and (2) continuance of deposition of Stuart Wolff came under submission before this Court. Having considered all papers and argument submitted, THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

As a preliminary matter, Defendant Peter Tafeen (“Tafeen”) requests joinder in Wolffs motion to continue. This Court GRANTS Tafeen’s request for joinder.

In addition, Wolff requests this Court take judicial notice of Exhibits 1-23 filed concurrently with the Declaration of Howard Privette.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 201(a), the Court may take judicial notice of adjudicative facts only. “[Ajdjudicative facts are those to which the law is applied in the process of adjudication.” Advisory Notes to Fed.R.Evid. 201 (quoting Kenneth Davis, 2 Administrative Law Treatise at 353). “A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” Fed.R.Evid. 201(b). A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.