Raich

Raich v. Ashcroft

Good Law
248 F. Supp. 2d 918·2003 WL 1058748
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2003C 02-4872 MJJCalifornia6,068 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

ORDER

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is plaintiffs Angel McClary Raich, Diane Monson, John Doe Number One, and John Doe Number Two’s (“Raich,” “Monson,” or “Plaintiffs”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Attorney General John Ashcroft (“Defendant” or “the government”). Plaintiffs seek to prevent the government from enforcing against them the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act prohibiting the manufacture, distribution, or possession of marijuana. Through California’s Compassionate Use Act of 1996, plaintiffs are permitted to use and cultivate marijuana for their personal medical purposes upon a doctor’s recommendation. This Act excepts “medical marijuana” from the usual statutory prohibition against possession of cultivation of marijuana found elsewhere in California law. Federal law has no corollary exceptions, however, for the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) does not recognize marijuana as having any legitimate medical purpose, and any possession or cultivation of marijuana remains illegal under this act. Plaintiffs ask the Court to enjoin defendant from applying federal law to their actions through a preliminary injunction.

According to plaintiffs, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.