Oriental Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Chun King Sales, Inc., and Jeno F. Paulucci, Chun King Sales, Inc., and Jeno F. Paulucci v. Oriental Foods, Inc., a Corporation

Good Law
244 F.2d 909·113 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 404·1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5355
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 195715104_1California4,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

244 F.2d 909 ORIENTAL FOODS, Inc., a corporation, Appellant, v. CHUN KING SALES, Inc., and Jeno F. Paulucci, Appellees. CHUN KING SALES, Inc., and Jeno F. Paulucci, Appellants, v. ORIENTAL FOODS, Inc., a corporation, Appellee. No. 15104. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 16, 1957. Harris, Kiech, Foster & Harris, Ford Harris, Jr., Walton Eugene Tinsley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Lyon & Lyon, Lewis E. Lyon, Robert Douglas Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., Williamson, Schroeder, Adams & Myers, Everett J. Schroeder, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, FEE and BARNES, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. 1 The plaintiff Chun King Sales, Inc. sought an injunction and damages for patent infringement and unfair competition. [ 28 U.S.C.A. § 1338 (a) and (b)] The patent involved is No. 2,679,281, issued on May 25, 1954, to Jeno Francis Paulucci. The defendant denied infringement, challenged the validity of the patent, and, in a counterclaim, asked for a declaration of invalidity. While the original pleadings as to the cause of action for infringement related to all three claims of the patent in suit, the plaintiff, at the trial, restricted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.