Seagate Technology LLC v. Dalian China Express International Corp.

Good Law
169 F. Supp. 2d 1146·2001 WL 1042866
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2001C 99-04917 MHPCalifornia6,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Seagate Technology LLC commenced this action following the loss of its international cargo in South San Francisco in November 1998. Now before the court are China Express and U-Freight’s motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment and Seagate’s counter-motions for summary judgment. Having considered the parties’ arguments and submissions, and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.

BACKGROUND

Seagate is a manufacturer of computer disc drives with offices in Scotts Valley, California and the People’s Republic of China. Defendants U-Freight America, Inc. (“U-Freight”) and Dalian China Express International Corporation, Ltd. (“China Express”) are freight forwarding companies hired by Seagate to ship a cargo of disc drives from Shanghai, China to San Francisco in November 1998. Defendant Gateway Cargo Services America (“Gateway’) is a ground cargo handling agent in South San Francisco, California. China Eastern Airlines (“China Eastern”) is an airline that flies between Shanghai, China and San Francisco, but has its principal place of business in the People’s Republic of China.

Per Seagate’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.