Saltzman

Saltzman v. Apfel

Good Law
125 F. Supp. 2d 1014·2000 WL 1880143·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20661
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2000CV 00-0246-DDP (RC)California2,619 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Púrsuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied; and (3) the Commissioner’s decision to terminate plaintiffs disability benefits as of January 1, 1997, is reversed, and Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on the parties.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Dean D. Pre-gerson, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

BACKGROUND

I

Plaintiff Michael Saltzman filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.