Hazleton

Hazleton v. Alameida

Good Law
358 F. Supp. 2d 926·2005 WL 517692·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6943
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2005CV036826LGB (AJW)California4,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baird, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, and the attached Amended Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge (“Report”). No objections to the Report have been filed within the time allowed. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a verified complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several California state prison officials and prison staff employed at California State Prison-Los Angeles County (“CSP-LAC”). Plaintiff alleges that defendants exhibited deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights, by exposing him unnecessarily to the hepatitis C virus and by failing properly to treat his resulting disease and complications he suffered. The complaint seeks monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief.

Defendants Alameida, Yarborough, Brown, Fitter, Pattanachinda, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.