Weber

Weber v. Lockyer

Good Law
365 F. Supp. 2d 1119·2005 WL 940449·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10900
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 2005C04-5161 FMSCalifornia2,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

This action is a class action lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 69, passed into law by California voters on November 2, 2004. Plaintiffs claim that the portions of the new law that require DNA testing of people who are arrested for but not convicted of a crime and people that were convicted of a felony in the past but are no longer subject to supervision by the criminal justice system violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendants, including the Attorney General of California and other California law enforcement officials, move to dismiss the action on the basis that the plaintiffs lack standing and their challenge is not ripe for adjudication. The Court issued a Tentative Order granting defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on April 12, 2005, and heard oral argument in April 14, 2005. For the following reasons, the Court now issues this final Order GRANTING defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

II. BACKGROUND

California voters passed Proposition 69, entitled the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act, on November 2, 2004. Complaint, Ex. A. Proposition 69 amended the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.