Huss

Huss v. City of Huntington Beach

Good Law
317 F. Supp. 2d 1151·2000 WL 34331955·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22627
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 14, 2000SACV 98-249 AHS(ANX)California5,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stotler, J.

ORDER: (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (3) SUMMARILY ADJUDICATING SPECIFIED ISSUES; (4) RESETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES

I.

SUMMARY

Plaintiffs seek summary adjudication that their rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act ( 29 U.S.C. § 201 , et seq.) (“FLSA”) are not limited by the terms of any agreement between the parties. Defendants seek summary judgment based on the purported existence of a reasonable agreement between the parties. In the alternative, defendants seek partial summary judgment (1) that a two-year statute of limitations applies to plaintiffs’ claims, and (2) that the limitations period was not tolled during the investigation of this case by the Department of Labor (“DOL”). The parties’ motions are hereby denied.

Notwithstanding denial of the parties’ motions, the discussion below provides a limited summary adjudication of issues relevant to the subsequent prosecution of this action. This disposition comes after careful review of the parties’ submissions and upon the Court’s independent research.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.