Fieldturf International, Inc. v. Sprinturf, Inc.

Good Law
395 F. Supp. 2d 929·2004 WL 3550685·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19517
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2004CIVS-021409FCDKJMCalifornia5,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Damrell, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on (1) cross-motions for summary judgment on plaintiffs FieldTurf International, Inc. and FieldTurf Inc.’s (collectively, “FieldTurf’) complaint against defendants SportFields LLC and Orion Corporation (collectively, “SportFields”); and (2) SportFields’ motion for summary judgment on its counter-complaint against FieldTurf. On the cross-motions, SportFields seeks summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication of all four of FieldTurfs claims for relief against it; namely, Field-Turfs first and second claims for relief for patent infringement based upon a purported offer to supply an infringing product; FieldTurfs third claim for relief for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage (“IIPEA”); and Field-Turfs fourth claim for relief for unfair competition. FieldTurf cross-moves for summary adjudication as to its first and second claims for relief for patent infringement. SportFields additionally moves for summary judgment as to its counter-complaint against FieldTurf which alleges two claims for relief for IIPEA and unfair competition.

The court heard oral argument on March 19, 2004. By this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.