Centennial Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Dave Schneider, Doing Business as Dave Schneider Wholesale Jewelry

Good Law
247 F.2d 491
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 195715337California2,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bone, J.

Centennial Insurance Co. (hereinafter “Centennial”), defendant below, appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court. The action was brought by Dave Schneider, doing business as Dave Schneider Wholesale Jewelry, to recover on a policy of insurance issued by Centennial to appellee on August 15, 1954, and continuing in force for a period of one year. The claimed loss of jewelry and their carrying cases allegedly covered by the policy occurred on December 3,1954.

On the morning of December 3, 1954, at about 10:00 A.M. appellee left his place of business. As a wholesale jeweler appellee traveled by car from retailer to retailer, carrying the jewelry to be displayed in two specially fitted cases which he carried in the trunk of his ear. Following his lunch, he drove to Bruce Jewelers in Inglewood, California, removed the cases from the trunk of his car, took them into the jewelry store, displayed his line of jewelry, returned the cases to the trunk, and drove to Joy Jewelry Company, also in Inglewood.

Appellee did not remove his cases at Joy Jewelry Co. He did not enter the premises, but talked with one of the buyers at Joy, Mr. Stelzer, in front of the store so he could see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.